Received: from relay1.UU.NET (relay1.UU.NET [192.48.96.5]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id SAA00433 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 18:20:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQztse27302; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 18:03:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA29037; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 18:03:35 -0500
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 18:03:35 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <0099AB6F.9B40AE1B.12406@SHSU.edu>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: stdcwd@SHSU.edu
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Stop Internet Censorship!
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
Just a quick reply to all of the e-mail flying about on the censorship issue.
Perhaps 1984 isn't the negative utopia book of the future. I am of the opninion
that "honor" belongs to Brave New World. If you haven't read it, do so.
I do not favor the government controlling our minds but come on. You
can't tell me that a discussion of the benefits of child pornography deserves
the same treatment as a discussion of the fourth amendment. The first amendment
is not an absolute right anyway, the law makes clear distinction between
protected speech and unprotected speech.
Nevertheless, the debate is immeterial-- the US government can't
